The Canadian Privacy Law Blog: Developments in privacy law and writings of a Canadian privacy lawyer, containing information related to the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (aka PIPEDA) and other Canadian and international laws.
The author of this blog, David T.S. Fraser, is a Canadian privacy lawyer who practices with the firm of McInnes Cooper. He is the author of the Physicians' Privacy Manual. He has a national and international practice advising corporations and individuals on matters related to Canadian privacy laws.
For full contact information and a brief bio, please see David's profile.
Please note that I am only able to provide legal advice to clients. I am not able to provide free legal advice. Any unsolicited information sent to David Fraser cannot be considered to be solicitor-client privileged.
The views expressed herein are solely the author's and should not be attributed to his employer or clients. Any postings on legal issues are provided as a public service, and do not constitute solicitation or provision of legal advice. The author makes no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained herein or linked to. Nothing herein should be used as a substitute for the advice of competent counsel.
This web site is presented for informational purposes only. These materials do not constitute legal advice and do not create a solicitor-client relationship between you and David T.S. Fraser. If you are seeking specific advice related to Canadian privacy law or PIPEDA, contact the author, David T.S. Fraser.
Wednesday, June 15, 2005
The Commissioner's Office has just released three new "findings" under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act. In short, they are:
Commissioner's Findings - Privacy Commissioner of Canada
- PIPEDA Case summary #303: Real estate broker publishes names of top five sales representatives in a city - Assistant Commissioner finds that statistics about real estate agent's sales are "personal information", when published in an advertisement by a competing broker.
- PIPEDA Case summary #302: Pharmacy's privacy policy and practices considered exemplary - Pharmacy's practices were inadequate, but they were reformulated to the Assistant Commissioner's satisfaction.
- PIPEDA Case summary #301: Property management company improves privacy policy - Just saying you're compliant doesn't cut it. Organizations need a privacy policy that complies with the Act and says who the privacy officer is, among other things.
Labels: information breaches, privacy
The Canadian Privacy Law Blog is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Canada License.