The Canadian Privacy Law Blog: Developments in privacy law and writings of a Canadian privacy lawyer, containing information related to the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (aka PIPEDA) and other Canadian and international laws.
The author of this blog, David T.S. Fraser, is a Canadian privacy lawyer who practices with the firm of McInnes Cooper. He is the author of the Physicians' Privacy Manual. He has a national and international practice advising corporations and individuals on matters related to Canadian privacy laws.
For full contact information and a brief bio, please see David's profile.
Please note that I am only able to provide legal advice to clients. I am not able to provide free legal advice. Any unsolicited information sent to David Fraser cannot be considered to be solicitor-client privileged.
The views expressed herein are solely the author's and should not be attributed to his employer or clients. Any postings on legal issues are provided as a public service, and do not constitute solicitation or provision of legal advice. The author makes no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained herein or linked to. Nothing herein should be used as a substitute for the advice of competent counsel.
This web site is presented for informational purposes only. These materials do not constitute legal advice and do not create a solicitor-client relationship between you and David T.S. Fraser. If you are seeking specific advice related to Canadian privacy law or PIPEDA, contact the author, David T.S. Fraser.
Tuesday, September 07, 2004
The Public Interest Advocacy Centre has been among the most active and vocal participants in the privacy debate in Canada. This country does not have the same organized consumer advocacy groups as does the United States. Consumer and citizen voices are often difficult to hear in policy debates. But on privacy matters, PIAC has had a lot to say and they have also undertaken some interesting projects.
To begin with, PIAC commented on the CSA Model Code (the heart of PIPEDA) and the bills that led to PIPEDA. They have participated in the consultation process and Philippa Lawson has appeared at privacy conferences to plead the public interest case. From the point of view of a privacy lawyer, one of their greatest contributions has been to complain to the Privacy Commissioner about the "opt-out" practices of a number of the countries companies and then to release the full text of the findings on their website. Because the Commissioner only releases brief summaries of her findings, these are instructive reading.
Labels: information breaches
The Canadian Privacy Law Blog is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Canada License.