The Canadian Privacy Law Blog: Developments in privacy law and writings of a Canadian privacy lawyer, containing information related to the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (aka PIPEDA) and other Canadian and international laws.
The author of this blog, David T.S. Fraser, is a Canadian privacy lawyer who practices with the firm of McInnes Cooper. He is the author of the Physicians' Privacy Manual. He has a national and international practice advising corporations and individuals on matters related to Canadian privacy laws.
For full contact information and a brief bio, please see David's profile.
Please note that I am only able to provide legal advice to clients. I am not able to provide free legal advice. Any unsolicited information sent to David Fraser cannot be considered to be solicitor-client privileged.
The views expressed herein are solely the author's and should not be attributed to his employer or clients. Any postings on legal issues are provided as a public service, and do not constitute solicitation or provision of legal advice. The author makes no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained herein or linked to. Nothing herein should be used as a substitute for the advice of competent counsel.
This web site is presented for informational purposes only. These materials do not constitute legal advice and do not create a solicitor-client relationship between you and David T.S. Fraser. If you are seeking specific advice related to Canadian privacy law or PIPEDA, contact the author, David T.S. Fraser.
Friday, May 21, 2004
On 30 March 2004, the Canadian cabinet passed an order-in-council adding to the list of bodies with "invetigative body" status under PIPEDA.
Organizations that receive this designation are able to take advantage of the consent exceptions contained in Section 7 of PIPEDA that specifically apply to investigative bodies. In particular, Section 7(3)(d) and (h.2) allow certain disclosures of personal information without consent:
(3) For the purpose of clause 4.3 of Schedule 1, and despite that note that accompanies that clause, an organization may disclose personal information without the knowledge or consent of the individual only if the disclosure is …
(d) Made on the initiative of the organization to an investigative body, a government institution or a part of a government institution and the organization
(i) has reasonable grounds to believe that the information relates to a breach of an agreement or a contravention of the laws of Canada, a province or a foreign jurisdiction that has been, is being or is about to be committed, or
(ii) suspects that the information relates to national security, the defence of Canada or the conduct of international affairs; …
(h.2) made by an investigative body and the disclosure is reasonable for purposes related to investigating a breach of an agreement or a contravention of the laws of Canada or a province; or … .
The amendments add a number of professional regulators to the list, as well as private investigators.
See the full text at the Canada Gazette web site:
"Vol. 138, No. 8 - April 21, 2004
Registration
SOR/2004-60 30 March, 2004
PERSONAL INFORMATION PROTECTION AND ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS ACT
Regulations Amending the Regulations Specifying Investigative Bodies
P.C. 2004-327 30 March, 2004
Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of Industry, pursuant to paragraph 26(1)(a.01) of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (see footnote a), hereby makes the annexed Regulations Amending the Regulations Specifying Investigative Bodies. "
Labels: information breaches
The Canadian Privacy Law Blog is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Canada License.